The blog where lululemon fans discuss & feed their addiction. Your resource for photos, reviews, & lulu news since 2008.
I'd buy those in a heartbeat if they were $98, but at $148?!? Heck to the no! They are cute but not that cute. I have a feeling much more will hit WMTM now as things won't move as quickly.
What color is nightfall? Is it the new navy?
I like the look/fit of the tight stuff pants. But with the cost of them, I would never buy them....
Nightfall was purple. I don't get it.
I should have been more clear about the *Night fall version - it refers to the reflective dot pattern along the side of the thigh and not the color. I think there are two *Night fall versions - one in black and one in Bordeax. All the others have dots at the ankle. The Night fall ones have also have a gold logo. I'll fix the post.
I thought CW-X tights were expensive @ $149... I'd rather buy them now than Lulu
Is it me or did the picture with the back pocket (Pic 10 I think), or does the pant look sheer? I think I can see her underwear? With the increase price points, that is NOT good!
i caved and bought the tight fall pants w the reflective dots down the side and if they are NOT MAGICAL i am returning them stat. i'm still huffing and puffing over these ridiculous prices, and they arent even in the new tech fabric either! full on lux (which i typically do not like...) we'll see - i hope they are a return because my wallet shed a tear.
We should boycott Lululemon so they know we are not ok with the price hikes. Well, at least I hope the ebay rip off artists lose.
The scalloped hem and reflectivity are appealing features. The price is ridic. And I make a decent income and am a hardcore runner that would use these. But I also have plenty and am not truly addicted (not any longer, anyway. Got out of that mode over a year ago, thank goodness).
Not worth the money sadly, at least in my opinion.
4:25 I am with you. I actually am currently looking elsewhere for workout gear. I think the price hike is a bad sign. I wish sweaty betty would have more interesting crops and running gear.M
@Anon 11:28: I noticed that too and was just coming on here to post that as well. Pic #10 is clearly sheer and you can clearly see her underwear. For $148 pants that's ridiculous.
Post a Comment